88R HB 188
by Rep. Moody, same lead author · Did not pass · same text
Introduced textLast action, Apr 24, 2023: Received from the House
Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.
Caption, 88R bill history
HB 655
Filed
Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade
relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a capital case.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
The 10-vote rule goes. One holdout juror means life, for cases starting September 1, 2027.
This bill changes what a judge must tell the jury when it decides between death and life in a capital case. Under current law, a jury needs 10 votes to give an answer that spares the defendant, and the bill removes that rule so that any answer short of a unanimous vote for the death-side answer is recorded as the life-side answer. Starting with cases that begin on or after September 1, 2027, jurors are told that one holdout juror is enough to put the life-side answer on the form.
Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 188 (Did not pass) and 89R HB 578 (Died in committee). Checked against 88R and 89R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 188 (Did not pass) and 89R HB 578 (Died in committee). Filed in 3 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R and 89R only.TRY NO. 3. Filed in 3 sessions: 88R, 89R and 90R. Checked against 88R and 89R only.
90R-HB655 · 2026-11-09
relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a capital case.
The 10-vote rule goes. One holdout juror means life, for cases starting September 1, 2027.
This bill changes what a judge must tell the jury when it decides between death and life in a capital case. Under current law, a jury needs 10 votes to give an answer that spares the defendant, and the bill removes that rule so that any answer short of a unanimous vote for the death-side answer is recorded as the life-side answer. Starting with cases that begin on or after September 1, 2027, jurors are told that one holdout juror is enough to put the life-side answer on the form.
[ ] NONE FOUND
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
THE TEXT
…“unless the jury answers an issue "yes" unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no"”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill tells capital juries that anything short of a unanimous vote for the death-side answer becomes the life-side answer, and jurors are told this up front, which makes a death sentence harder to reach.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Not tied to this bill.
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 9, 2024 to Jun 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
$85,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 8, 2024 to Jun 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100979067, 101003930, 101054759.
$25,000.00
Also funds 44 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101003930.
$14,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 1, 2024 to May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100979067, 101024872, 101054759.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
$85,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 8, 2024 to Jun 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100979067, 101003930, 101054759.
$25,000.00
Also funds 44 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101003930.
$14,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Oct 1, 2024 to May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100979067, 101024872, 101054759.
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.
Filed 3 times: 88R, 89R and now. Checked against 88R and 89R only.
by Rep. Moody, same lead author · Did not pass · same text
Introduced textLast action, Apr 24, 2023: Received from the House
Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.
Caption, 88R bill history
by Rep. Moody, same lead author · Died in committee · same text
Introduced textLast action, Mar 3, 2025: Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.
Caption, 89R bill history
Texas House · Filed Nov 9, 2026
11/09/2026 H Filed
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:35 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
SB 60 by Zaffirini (identical)
Courts--Juries
Crimes--Capital Punishment
Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment
The text as introduced · 398 words
90R4009 MEW-D By: Moody H.B. No. 655 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a capital case. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Sections 2(d) and (f), Article 37.071, Code of Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows: (d) The court shall charge the jury that: (1) in deliberating on the issues submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ], the jury [ it ] shall consider all evidence admitted at the guilt or innocence stage and the punishment stage, including evidence of the defendant's background or character or the circumstances of the offense that militates for or mitigates against the imposition of the death penalty; (2) the jury [ it ] may not answer any issue submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ] "yes" unless the jury [ it ] agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers an issue "yes" unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no" [ unless 10 or more jurors agree ]; and (3) members of the jury need not agree on what particular evidence supports a negative answer to any issue submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ]. (f) The court shall charge the jury that in answering the issue submitted under Subsection (e) [ of this article ], the jury: (1) shall answer the issue "yes" or "no"; (2) may not answer the issue "no" unless the jury [ it ] agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers the issue "no" unanimously, the jury shall [ may not ] answer the issue "yes" [ unless 10 or more jurors agree ]; (3) need not agree on what particular evidence supports an affirmative finding on the issue; and (4) shall consider mitigating evidence to be evidence that a juror might regard as reducing the defendant's moral blameworthiness. SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commenced before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.