Monitoring the Session

HB 655

Moody Bill Lets One Juror Block A Death Sentence

Filed

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Joe MoodyDHouse 78

Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade

Caption

relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a capital case.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

The 10-vote rule goes. One holdout juror means life, for cases starting September 1, 2027.

This bill changes what a judge must tell the jury when it decides between death and life in a capital case. Under current law, a jury needs 10 votes to give an answer that spares the defendant, and the bill removes that rule so that any answer short of a unanimous vote for the death-side answer is recorded as the life-side answer. Starting with cases that begin on or after September 1, 2027, jurors are told that one holdout juror is enough to put the life-side answer on the form.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 188 (Did not pass) and 89R HB 578 (Died in committee). Checked against 88R and 89R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 188 (Did not pass) and 89R HB 578 (Died in committee). Filed in 3 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R and 89R only.TRY NO. 3. Filed in 3 sessions: 88R, 89R and 90R. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

Receipt

The receipt

90R-HB655 · 2026-11-09

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a capital case.

WHAT IT DOES

The 10-vote rule goes. One holdout juror means life, for cases starting September 1, 2027.

This bill changes what a judge must tell the jury when it decides between death and life in a capital case. Under current law, a jury needs 10 votes to give an answer that spares the defendant, and the bill removes that rule so that any answer short of a unanimous vote for the death-side answer is recorded as the life-side answer. Starting with cases that begin on or after September 1, 2027, jurors are told that one holdout juror is enough to put the life-side answer on the form.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
FILED UNDER

SOFT ON CRIME

THE TEXT

…“unless the jury answers an issue "yes" unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no"”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill tells capital juries that anything short of a unanimous vote for the death-side answer becomes the life-side answer, and jurors are told this up front, which makes a death sentence harder to reach.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 9, 2024 to Jun 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$85,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$85,000.00

Cash
$85,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$85,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 8, 2024 to Jun 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101003930, 101054759.

Texans for Truth and Liberty PAC$25,000.00

Texans for Truth and Liberty PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 44 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101003930.

Texas Sands PAC$14,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$14,000.00

Cash
$14,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$14,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 1, 2024 to May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101024872, 101054759.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$85,000.00

Cash
$85,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$85,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 8, 2024 to Jun 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101003930, 101054759.

×

Texans for Truth and Liberty PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 44 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101003930.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$14,000.00

Cash
$14,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$14,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 1, 2024 to May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101024872, 101054759.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 3 times: 88R, 89R and now. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

88R HB 188

by Rep. Moody, same lead author · Did not pass · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Apr 24, 2023: Received from the House

Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

Caption, 88R bill history

89R HB 578

by Rep. Moody, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 3, 2025: Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence

Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

Caption, 89R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 9, 2026

11/09/2026 H Filed

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:35 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Companion

SB 60 by Zaffirini (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Juries

Crimes--Capital Punishment

Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment

Text

The text as introduced · 398 words

90R4009 MEW-D

By: Moody
H.B. No. 655

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a

capital case.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 2(d) and (f), Article 37.071, Code of

Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows:

(d) The court shall charge the jury that:

(1) in deliberating on the issues submitted under

Subsection (b) [ of this article ], the jury [ it ] shall consider all

evidence admitted at the guilt or innocence stage and the

punishment stage, including evidence of the defendant's background

or character or the circumstances of the offense that militates for

or mitigates against the imposition of the death penalty;

(2) the jury [ it ] may not answer any issue submitted

under Subsection (b) [ of this article ] "yes" unless the jury [ it ]

agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers an issue "yes"

unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no"

[ unless 10 or more jurors agree ]; and

(3) members of the jury need not agree on what

particular evidence supports a negative answer to any issue

submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ].

(f) The court shall charge the jury that in answering the

issue submitted under Subsection (e) [ of this article ], the jury:

(1) shall answer the issue "yes" or "no";

(2) may not answer the issue "no" unless the jury [ it ]

agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers the issue "no"

unanimously, the jury shall [ may not ] answer the issue "yes"

[ unless 10 or more jurors agree ];

(3) need not agree on what particular evidence

supports an affirmative finding on the issue; and

(4) shall consider mitigating evidence to be evidence

that a juror might regard as reducing the defendant's moral

blameworthiness.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective

date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commenced before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the

date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in

effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.