Monitoring the Session

SB 60

Zaffirini Bill Lets One Juror Block A Death Sentence

Filed

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Judith ZaffiriniDSenate 21

Initial review · graded Nov 9, 2026 · How we grade

Caption

relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a capital case.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Death now needs all 12 jurors. One holdout means life, starting with cases from September 1, 2027.

This bill changes what the judge tells the jury when it decides between death and life in prison in a capital case. Under current law, 10 jurors had to agree to answer a sentencing question in the defendant's favor, but now the jury must answer in the defendant's favor unless all 12 agree on the answer that leads to death. Jurors are now told directly that one holdout produces the answer that leads to a life sentence, starting with cases that begin on or after September 1, 2027.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 188 by Rep. Moody (Did not pass) and 89R SB 1094 (Died in committee). Checked against 88R and 89R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 188 by Rep. Moody (Did not pass) and 89R SB 1094 (Died in committee). Filed in 3 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R and 89R only.TRY NO. 3. Filed in 3 sessions: 88R, 89R and 90R. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

Receipt

The receipt

90R-SB60 · 2026-11-09

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a capital case.

WHAT IT DOES

Death now needs all 12 jurors. One holdout means life, starting with cases from September 1, 2027.

This bill changes what the judge tells the jury when it decides between death and life in prison in a capital case. Under current law, 10 jurors had to agree to answer a sentencing question in the defendant's favor, but now the jury must answer in the defendant's favor unless all 12 agree on the answer that leads to death. Jurors are now told directly that one holdout produces the answer that leads to a life sentence, starting with cases that begin on or after September 1, 2027.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
FILED UNDER

SOFT ON CRIME

THE TEXT

…“unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no"”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill drops the 10-juror rule and tells capital juries that anything short of a unanimous vote for the death-leading answer becomes the life-sentence answer, which makes a death sentence harder to reach.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Carlos M. Zaffirini Jr$110,000.00
Killam Development Ltd.$72,700.00

Killam Development Ltd.

$72,700.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$62,700.00
Total
$72,700.00
advertising $33,000.00media $29,700.00

Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$60,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Killam Development Ltd.

$72,700.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$62,700.00
Total
$72,700.00
advertising $33,000.00media $29,700.00

Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by a super-expensive superintelligence, Nov 9, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 3 times: 88R, 89R and now. Checked against 88R and 89R only.

88R HB 188

by Rep. Moody, different lead author · Did not pass · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Apr 24, 2023: Received from the House

Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

Caption, 88R bill history

89R SB 1094

by Sen. Zaffirini, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Feb 24, 2025: Referred to Criminal Justice

Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

Caption, 89R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Nov 9, 2026

11/09/2026 S Filed

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Nov 10, 2026 at 2:39 AM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Companion

HB 655 by Moody (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Juries

Crimes--Capital Punishment

Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment

Text

The text as introduced · 398 words

90R4009 MEW-D

By: Zaffirini
S.B. No. 60

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the jury charges during the sentencing proceedings in a

capital case.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 2(d) and (f), Article 37.071, Code of

Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows:

(d) The court shall charge the jury that:

(1) in deliberating on the issues submitted under

Subsection (b) [ of this article ], the jury [ it ] shall consider all

evidence admitted at the guilt or innocence stage and the

punishment stage, including evidence of the defendant's background

or character or the circumstances of the offense that militates for

or mitigates against the imposition of the death penalty;

(2) the jury [ it ] may not answer any issue submitted

under Subsection (b) [ of this article ] "yes" unless the jury [ it ]

agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers an issue "yes"

unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no"

[ unless 10 or more jurors agree ]; and

(3) members of the jury need not agree on what

particular evidence supports a negative answer to any issue

submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ].

(f) The court shall charge the jury that in answering the

issue submitted under Subsection (e) [ of this article ], the jury:

(1) shall answer the issue "yes" or "no";

(2) may not answer the issue "no" unless the jury [ it ]

agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers the issue "no"

unanimously, the jury shall [ may not ] answer the issue "yes"

[ unless 10 or more jurors agree ];

(3) need not agree on what particular evidence

supports an affirmative finding on the issue; and

(4) shall consider mitigating evidence to be evidence

that a juror might regard as reducing the defendant's moral

blameworthiness.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective

date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commenced before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the

date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in

effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2027.