Monitoring the Session

HB 3170

Cain’s $10K Legal Fee Cap Ends At A Board Vote

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Briscoe CainRHouse 128
Why it's charged
The hole

THE TEXT

“authorize the district to spend an amount in legal”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption advertises a limit on legal fees, but the school board can vote to spend past the $10,000 cap in any case. The cap works as a trigger for a board vote and public reporting, not a hard ceiling.

The hole

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to transparency in special education legal proceedings involving a school district and a limit on legal fees that may be spent by a school district in special education legal proceedings.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Fees hit 80 percent, and the board settles or votes to spend past the cap.

The bill sets a $10,000 cap on what a school district may spend on lawyers to defend itself against a special education due process complaint. When fees reach 80 percent of the cap, the superintendent must give the school board a confidential report, and the board must either settle the case or vote to spend past the cap. Districts that go over the cap must post monthly fee reports online and send them to the state education agency, which posts statewide and district-by-district totals each month.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 2510 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 2510 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 21, 2025 and referred to the House Public Education committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB3170 · 2025-02-21

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to transparency in special education legal proceedings involving a school district and a limit on legal fees that may be spent by a school district in special education legal proceedings.

WHAT IT DOES

Fees hit 80 percent, and the board settles or votes to spend past the cap.

The bill sets a $10,000 cap on what a school district may spend on lawyers to defend itself against a special education due process complaint. When fees reach 80 percent of the cap, the superintendent must give the school board a confidential report, and the board must either settle the case or vote to spend past the cap. Districts that go over the cap must post monthly fee reports online and send them to the state education agency, which posts statewide and district-by-district totals each month.

CHARGES

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 55%

THE TEXT

“authorize the district to spend an amount in legal”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption advertises a limit on legal fees, but the school board can vote to spend past the $10,000 cap in any case. The cap works as a trigger for a board vote and public reporting, not a hard ceiling.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Public Education
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Adam Loewy$7,500Emerson Hankamer$5,205Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$5K

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to May 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Adam Loewy$7,500.00
Emerson Hankamer$5,205.08
Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$5,000.00

Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033926.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033926.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 2510

by Rep. Cain, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, May 9, 2023: Referred to Education

Relating to transparency in certain contracts involving a school district.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Feb 21, 2025

03/20/2025 H Referred to Public Education: Mar 20 2025 11:50AM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Public Education · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 111 by Hall (identical)

Subjects

Education--Primary & Secondary--Finance

Education--Primary & Secondary--Special

Education--School Districts

EDUCATION AGENCY, TEXAS

EDUCATION, COMMISSIONER OF

Text

The text as introduced · 600 words

89R2427 JTZ-D

By: Cain
H.B. No. 3170

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to transparency in special education legal proceedings

involving a school district and a limit on legal fees that may be

spent by a school district in special education legal proceedings.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter Z, Chapter 44, Education Code, is

amended by adding Section 44.903 to read as follows:

Sec. 44.903. BOARD AUTHORIZATION TO SETTLE OR CONTEST

SPECIAL EDUCATION LAWSUITS; REPORTS TO AGENCY. (a) This section

applies only to a due process complaint against a school district

alleging a violation of federal or state special education laws.

(b) Except as otherwise provided by this section, a school

district may not spend more than $10,000 in legal fees to defend the

district in a legal proceeding to which this section applies.

(c) If a school district spends an amount in legal fees to

defend the district in a legal proceeding to which this section

applies that is at least 80 percent of the limit imposed by

Subsection (b) and intends to continue the proceeding, the district

superintendent shall submit to the board of trustees of the

district a report that:

(1) states that the current cost in legal fees in the

proceeding is approaching the limit imposed by Subsection (b); and

(2) includes:

(A) a summary of the facts, legal claims,

defenses, and relief sought in the proceeding; and

(B) an estimate of the total amount in legal fees

that will be required to defend the district in the proceeding.

(d) A report submitted under Subsection (c) is confidential

and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code.

(e) As soon as practicable after receipt of a report under

Subsection (c), the board of trustees of the school district shall:

(1) direct the district to settle the legal proceeding

before the total cost in legal fees exceeds the limit imposed by

Subsection (b); or

(2) authorize the district to spend an amount in legal

fees in excess of the limit imposed by Subsection (b) to defend the

district in the legal proceeding.

(f) Each month, a school district shall post on the

district's Internet website and submit to the agency a report

regarding each ongoing legal proceeding to which this section

applies for which the district's legal fees exceed the limit

imposed by Subsection (b), including:

(1) the general subject matter of the proceeding; and

(2) the total amount of legal fees incurred by the

district for the proceeding as of the date on which the report is

made.

(g) A report required under Subsection (f) may not include

personally identifiable student information and must comply with

the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 U.S.C.

Section 1232g).

(h) Each month, the agency shall compile and post on the

agency's Internet website the information reported to the agency

under Subsection (f) for the preceding month. The information must

be both aggregated statewide and disaggregated by school district.

(i) The commissioner may adopt rules as necessary to

implement this section.

SECTION 2. Section 44.903, Education Code, as added by this

Act, applies only to a legal proceeding to which that section

applies that is filed on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.