Monitoring the Session

SB 111

Hall Bill’s $10K Legal Fee Cap Lifts With A Board Vote

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Sen. Bob HallRSenate 2
Why it's charged
The hole

THE TEXT

“authorize the district to spend an amount in legal”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption sells a limit on legal fees, but the school board can vote to lift the $10,000 cap in any case it wants to keep fighting. That makes the cap a board-approval checkpoint, not a hard limit.

The hole

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to transparency in special education legal proceedings involving a school district and a limit on legal fees that may be spent by a school district in special education legal proceedings.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Fees hit 80 percent? Board settles or votes past the cap. Over-cap districts post monthly reports.

The bill caps what a school district may spend on lawyers to defend a special education due process complaint at $10,000, unless its school board votes to allow more. When fees reach 80 percent of the cap, the superintendent must give the board a confidential report, and the board must either settle the case or approve spending past the cap. Districts over the cap must post monthly fee reports online and send them to the state education agency, which posts the totals statewide and by district.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R SB 392 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 392 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on May 12, 2025. Died in the House: never got out of the Public Education committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB111 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

+ 3 coauthors

ITEM

relating to transparency in special education legal proceedings involving a school district and a limit on legal fees that may be spent by a school district in special education legal proceedings.

WHAT IT DOES

Fees hit 80 percent? Board settles or votes past the cap. Over-cap districts post monthly reports.

The bill caps what a school district may spend on lawyers to defend a special education due process complaint at $10,000, unless its school board votes to allow more. When fees reach 80 percent of the cap, the superintendent must give the board a confidential report, and the board must either settle the case or approve spending past the cap. Districts over the cap must post monthly fee reports online and send them to the state education agency, which posts the totals statewide and by district.

CHARGES

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

“authorize the district to spend an amount in legal”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption sells a limit on legal fees, but the school board can vote to lift the $10,000 cap in any case it wants to keep fighting. That makes the cap a board-approval checkpoint, not a hard limit.

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($323,102)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version E · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 14, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB111, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($1,015,090) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($323,102)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Education K-16
  5. Posting rule suspended
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken in committee
  9. Left pending in committee
  10. Co-author authorized
  11. Considered in public hearing
  12. Vote taken in committee
  13. Reported favorably as substituted
  14. Committee report printed and distributed
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  17. Record vote
  18. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  19. Record vote
  20. Three day rule suspended
  21. Record vote
  22. Read 3rd time
  23. Passed
  24. Record vote
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the Senate
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to Public Education
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 25 yea · 5 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · May 12, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$135,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$135,000.00

Cash
$129,000.00
Paid by others
$6,000.00
Total
$135,000.00
polling $6,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 12, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987789, 101010195, 101040645, 101069307, 101073278.

Texans United for a Conservative Majority PAC$116,000.00

Texans United for a Conservative Majority PAC

$116,000.00

Cash
$110,000.00
Paid by others
$6,000.00
Total
$116,000.00
polling $6,000.00

Also funds 30 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 3, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 27, 2025 to Oct 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010195, 101033131, 101073278.

Bryan Hughes Campaign$100,000.00

Bryan Hughes Campaign

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 29, 2026 to Oct 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 29, 2026 to Oct 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101073278.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$135,000.00

Cash
$129,000.00
Paid by others
$6,000.00
Total
$135,000.00
polling $6,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 12, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987789, 101010195, 101040645, 101069307, 101073278.

×

Texans United for a Conservative Majority PAC

$116,000.00

Cash
$110,000.00
Paid by others
$6,000.00
Total
$116,000.00
polling $6,000.00

Also funds 30 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 3, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 27, 2025 to Oct 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010195, 101033131, 101073278.

×

Bryan Hughes Campaign

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 29, 2026 to Oct 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 29, 2026 to Oct 5, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101073278.

Votes4

Senate May 12, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 5. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 12, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hall moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 111 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 12, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 5. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 12, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hall moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 111 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 111, Relating to reporting by school districts regarding special education legal proceedings in which a certain amount of legal fees has been incurred by the district. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses20
For
9
Against
8
On
3
Names

For

  • Coalition of Texans with Disabilities1 registration
  • Disability Rights Texas1 registration
  • Self7 registrations

Against

  • Self5 registrations
  • Self; ATPE1 registration
  • Texas Association of Community Schools1 registration
  • Texas Council of Administrators of Special Education (TCASE)1 registration

On

  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Pflugerville ISD1 registration
  • Texas Education Agency1 registration
Sources

20 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($323,102)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version E · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 14, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB111, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($1,015,090) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($323,102)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 392

by Sen. Hall, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Feb 15, 2023: Referred to Education

Relating to transparency in certain legal proceedings and contracts involving a school district and a limit on legal fees that may be spent by a school district in certain legal proceedings.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Nov 12, 2024

05/14/2025 H Referred to Public Education: May 14 2025 12:07AM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 2:01 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors

House committee · Public Education · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · Education K-16 · Committee vote 10 aye, 1 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 3170 by Cain (identical)

Subjects

Education--Primary & Secondary--Finance

Education--Primary & Secondary--Special

Education--School Districts

Protection of Personal Information

EDUCATION AGENCY, TEXAS

EDUCATION, COMMISSIONER OF

Text

The text as introduced · 600 words

89R2427 JTZ-D

By: Hall
S.B. No. 111

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to transparency in special education legal proceedings

involving a school district and a limit on legal fees that may be

spent by a school district in special education legal proceedings.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter Z, Chapter 44, Education Code, is

amended by adding Section 44.903 to read as follows:

Sec. 44.903. BOARD AUTHORIZATION TO SETTLE OR CONTEST

SPECIAL EDUCATION LAWSUITS; REPORTS TO AGENCY. (a) This section

applies only to a due process complaint against a school district

alleging a violation of federal or state special education laws.

(b) Except as otherwise provided by this section, a school

district may not spend more than $10,000 in legal fees to defend the

district in a legal proceeding to which this section applies.

(c) If a school district spends an amount in legal fees to

defend the district in a legal proceeding to which this section

applies that is at least 80 percent of the limit imposed by

Subsection (b) and intends to continue the proceeding, the district

superintendent shall submit to the board of trustees of the

district a report that:

(1) states that the current cost in legal fees in the

proceeding is approaching the limit imposed by Subsection (b); and

(2) includes:

(A) a summary of the facts, legal claims,

defenses, and relief sought in the proceeding; and

(B) an estimate of the total amount in legal fees

that will be required to defend the district in the proceeding.

(d) A report submitted under Subsection (c) is confidential

and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code.

(e) As soon as practicable after receipt of a report under

Subsection (c), the board of trustees of the school district shall:

(1) direct the district to settle the legal proceeding

before the total cost in legal fees exceeds the limit imposed by

Subsection (b); or

(2) authorize the district to spend an amount in legal

fees in excess of the limit imposed by Subsection (b) to defend the

district in the legal proceeding.

(f) Each month, a school district shall post on the

district's Internet website and submit to the agency a report

regarding each ongoing legal proceeding to which this section

applies for which the district's legal fees exceed the limit

imposed by Subsection (b), including:

(1) the general subject matter of the proceeding; and

(2) the total amount of legal fees incurred by the

district for the proceeding as of the date on which the report is

made.

(g) A report required under Subsection (f) may not include

personally identifiable student information and must comply with

the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 U.S.C.

Section 1232g).

(h) Each month, the agency shall compile and post on the

agency's Internet website the information reported to the agency

under Subsection (f) for the preceding month. The information must

be both aggregated statewide and disaggregated by school district.

(i) The commissioner may adopt rules as necessary to

implement this section.

SECTION 2. Section 44.903, Education Code, as added by this

Act, applies only to a legal proceeding to which that section

applies that is filed on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.