Monitoring the Session

SB 1883

Bettencourt Impact Fee Bill Gives Developers Half The Panel

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7
Why it's charged
Carve-out

THE TEXT

…“the real estate, development, or building industries who are not”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill raises the guaranteed share of the impact fee advisory committee held by the industries that pay impact fees from 40 to 50 percent, giving that one industry group at least half the seats on the panel advising on its own fees. The caption describes only general approval procedures.

Carve-out

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

From 40% to 50%, on the panel advising on the fees they pay!

The bill changes how cities and other local governments approve impact fees, the charges they put on new development to pay for roads, water and other infrastructure. It requires a two-thirds vote of the governing body to approve a fee, freezes any fee increase for three years, requires plans to be public at least 60 days before the hearing notice, and gives the governing body 120 days instead of 60 to set a hearing on updates. It also raises the share of the fee advisory committee that must come from the real estate, development or building industries from 40 percent to 50 percent, and ends the option of letting the planning and zoning commission serve as that committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1883 · 2025-03-04

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to the approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees.

WHAT IT DOES

From 40% to 50%, on the panel advising on the fees they pay!

The bill changes how cities and other local governments approve impact fees, the charges they put on new development to pay for roads, water and other infrastructure. It requires a two-thirds vote of the governing body to approve a fee, freezes any fee increase for three years, requires plans to be public at least 60 days before the hearing notice, and gives the governing body 120 days instead of 60 to set a hearing on updates. It also raises the share of the fee advisory committee that must come from the real estate, development or building industries from 40 percent to 50 percent, and ends the option of letting the planning and zoning commission serve as that committee.

CHARGES

[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 50%

THE TEXT

…“the real estate, development, or building industries who are not”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill raises the guaranteed share of the impact fee advisory committee held by the industries that pay impact fees from 40 to 50 percent, giving that one industry group at least half the seats on the panel advising on its own fees. The caption describes only general approval procedures.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 18, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Placed on intent calendar
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  18. Record vote
  19. Three day rule suspended
  20. Record vote
  21. Read 3rd time
  22. Passed
  23. Record vote
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the Senate
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  28. Considered in formal meeting
  29. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  30. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  31. Committee report distributed
  32. Committee report sent to Calendars
  33. Laid out in lieu of companion HB 2225
  34. Read 2nd time
  35. Amendment withdrawn 1-Buckley
  36. Postponed 5/13/25 2:30 PM
  37. Laid out as postponed business
  38. Amendment(s) offered 2-Buckley
  39. Amendment amended 3-Romero
  40. Amendment adopted as amended 2-Buckley
  41. Amendment fails of adoption 4-Romero
  42. Record vote RV#2331
  43. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  44. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  45. Record vote RV#2332
  46. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  47. Read 3rd time
  48. Postponed 5/16/25 8:00 AM
  49. Laid out as postponed business
  50. Amended 1-Romero
  51. Passed as amended
  52. Record vote RV#2920
  53. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  54. House passage as amended reported
  55. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  56. Read
  57. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  58. Record vote
  59. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  60. Reported enrolled
  61. Signed in the Senate
  62. Signed in the House
  63. Sent to the Governor
  64. Signed by the Governor
  65. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 87 yea · 32 nay

Senate · 26 yea · 5 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 16, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Apr 23, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes8

Senate May 21, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to concur in the House amendments to SB 1883. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 16, 2025

Yea
87
Nay
32
Present, not voting
1
Absent
8
Excused
22
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2920

SB 1883, as amended, was passed by (Record 2920): 87 Yeas, 32 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 87 (published)
  • Nay: 32 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 8 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 22 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 13, 2025

Yea
75
Nay
62
Present, not voting
2
Absent
6
Excused
5
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2332

SB 1883, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 2332): 75 Yeas, 62 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 75 (published)
  • Nay: 62 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 6 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 5 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 13, 2025

Yea
61
Nay
75
Present, not voting
3
Absent
6
Excused
5
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2331

Amendment No. 4 failed of adoption by (Record 2331): 61 Yeas, 75 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 61 (published)
  • Nay: 75 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 6 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 5 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 1883 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 1883 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 1883, Relating to the approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses34
For
30
Against
4
On
0
Names

For

  • Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP1 registration
  • Amherst1 registration
  • Dallas Builders Association1 registration
  • GBVBA1 registration
  • Independent Bankers Assoc of Texas1 registration
  • National Rental Home Council1 registration
  • Perry homes1 registration
  • Real Estate Council of Austin1 registration
  • Schwartz, Page & Harding, LLP1 registration
  • Self; Dallas Builders Association2 registrations
  • Self; David Weekley Homes1 registration
  • Self; GBVBA1 registration
  • Self; Greater Fort Worth Builders Association1 registration
  • Self; Greater Houston Builders Association2 registrations
  • Self; Hillwood1 registration
  • Self; Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.1 registration
  • Self; KB Home1 registration
  • Self; TAB1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association of Builders1 registration
  • Self; The Real Estate Council of San Antonio1 registration
  • Texans for Reasonble Solutions1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders2 registrations
  • Texas Manufactured Housing Association1 registration
  • Texas Mortgage Bankers Association1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation2 registrations
  • Texas Realtors1 registration

Against

  • City of College Station1 registration
  • City of Garland1 registration
  • Self2 registrations
Sources

34 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 18, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 4, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 3:17 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 6 aye, 1 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 5 aye, 1 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 2225 by Buckley (similar)

Subjects

City Government--Finance

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

County Government--Land Use & Zoning

Fees & Other Nontax Revenue--Local

Political Subdivisions

AUDITS & AUDITORS

Text

The text as introduced · 854 words

89R12467 JBD-D

By: Bettencourt
S.B. No. 1883

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the approval of land use assumptions, capital

improvement plans, and impact fees.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 395.043, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 395.043. INFORMATION ABOUT LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC. At least 60 days [ On

or ] before the date of the first publication of the notice of the

hearing on the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan,

the political subdivision shall make available to the public its

land use assumptions, the time period of the projections, and a

description of the capital improvement facilities that may be

proposed.

SECTION 2. Section 395.051(a), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) The political subdivision, within 30 days after the date

of the public hearing on the imposition of an impact fee, shall

approve or disapprove the imposition of an impact fee. Approval of

the imposition of an impact fee by a political subdivision requires

an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members of the governing

body of the political subdivision.

SECTION 3. Subchapter C, Chapter 395, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Section 395.0515 to read as follows:

Sec. 395.0515. LIMITATION ON IMPACT FEE INCREASE. A

political subdivision may not increase the amount of an impact fee

for three years from the later of the date the fee was adopted or

most recently increased, if applicable.

SECTION 4. Section 395.053, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 395.053. HEARING ON UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. The governing body of the political

subdivision shall, within 120 [ 60 ] days after the date it receives

the update of the land use assumptions and the capital improvements

plan, adopt an order setting a public hearing to discuss and review

the update and shall determine whether to amend the plan.

SECTION 5. Section 395.054, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 395.054. HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO LAND USE

ASSUMPTIONS, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, OR IMPACT FEE. A public

hearing must be held by the governing body of the political

subdivision to discuss the proposed ordinance, order, or resolution

amending land use assumptions, the capital improvements plan, or

the impact fee. At least 60 days [ On or ] before the date of the

first publication of the notice of the hearing on the amendments,

the land use assumptions and the capital improvements plan,

including the amount of any proposed amended impact fee per service

unit, shall be made available to the public.

SECTION 6. Section 395.058(b), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(b) The advisory committee is composed of not less than five

members who shall be appointed by a majority vote of the governing

body of the political subdivision. Not less than 50 [ 40 ] percent of

the membership of the advisory committee must be representatives of

the real estate, development, or building industries who are not

employees or officials of a political subdivision or governmental

entity. [ If the political subdivision has a planning and zoning

commission, the commission may act as the advisory committee if the

commission includes at least one representative of the real estate,

development, or building industry who is not an employee or

official of a political subdivision or governmental entity. If no

such representative is a member of the planning and zoning

commission, the commission may still act as the advisory committee

if at least one such representative is appointed by the political

subdivision as an ad hoc voting member of the planning and zoning

commission when it acts as the advisory committee. ] If the impact

fee is to be applied in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the

political subdivision, the membership must include a

representative from that area.

SECTION 7. Sections 395.043 and 395.054, Local Government

Code, as amended by this Act, apply only to a land use assumption,

capital improvement plan, or impact fee that is the subject of a

public hearing required to be held by Section 395.042 or 395.053 of

that code, as applicable, that is held on or after the 90th day

after the effective date of this Act. A land use assumption,

capital improvement plan, or impact fee subject to a public hearing

that is held before the 90th day after the effective date of this

Act is governed by the law in effect immediately before the

effective date of this Act, and the former law is continued in

effect for that purpose.

SECTION 8. Section 395.051(a), Local Government Code, as

amended by this Act, applies only to the approval of the imposition

of an impact fee on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 9. Section 395.0515, Local Government Code, as

added by this Act, applies only to the increase of the amount of an

impact fee that is adopted on or after the effective date of this

Act.

SECTION 10. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.