Monitoring the Session

SB 15

Bettencourt Bill Keeps Exceptions To Its Lot-Size Limits On Cities

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7
Both charges, and why
Carve-out

THE TEXT

…“enforcement training center in a county that has a population of”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

One exemption from the lot-size limits is written for the area around a law enforcement training center in a county of 2.6 million or more, which describes a very narrow set of places.

Carve-out
The hole

THE TEXT

…“subchapter does not prohibit a municipality from imposing”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The savings clause lets a city impose restrictions that apply to all similarly situated lots or subdivisions. That language could be read to let broad rules back in against the small-lot protections.

The hole

On Nov 1, 2026 the editor checked the caption mismatch charge against the bill's caption and removed it.

Corrected Nov 1, 2026

Corrected Nov 1, 2026 · We checked this summary against the bill text and fixed it.

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to size and density requirements for residential lots in certain municipalities; authorizing a fee.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Cities retain rules for similarly situated lots. A population bracket protects a law-enforcement training area.

The bill bars cities with more than 150,000 people, in counties with more than 300,000 people, from requiring new single-family lots on unplatted tracts of five acres or more to be larger than 1,400 square feet, and it limits setbacks, parking, open space and height rules on lots of 4,000 square feet or less. It touches big-city zoning offices, home builders and landowners, and it exempts land near airports, military bases and a law enforcement training center in a county of 2.6 million or more. On the ground, builders in those cities can plat much smaller and denser lots, and anyone harmed or any qualifying housing group can sue the city and collect attorney's fees if it wins.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote Jun 1, 2025: the House adopted the conference committee report. 1 day before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.FEE INCLUDED. The caption of the graded version (House committee report) reads: “relating to size and density requirements for residential lots in certain municipalities; authorizing a fee.”ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 8 Republicans, 2 Democrats. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB15 · 2025-03-04

SOLD BY

+ 7 more authors, 4 coauthors

ITEM

relating to size and density requirements for residential lots in certain municipalities; authorizing a fee.

WHAT IT DOES

Cities retain rules for similarly situated lots. A population bracket protects a law-enforcement training area.

The bill bars cities with more than 150,000 people, in counties with more than 300,000 people, from requiring new single-family lots on unplatted tracts of five acres or more to be larger than 1,400 square feet, and it limits setbacks, parking, open space and height rules on lots of 4,000 square feet or less. It touches big-city zoning offices, home builders and landowners, and it exempts land near airports, military bases and a law enforcement training center in a county of 2.6 million or more. On the ground, builders in those cities can plat much smaller and denser lots, and anyone harmed or any qualifying housing group can sue the city and collect attorney's fees if it wins.

CHARGES

[x] CARVE-OUTanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

…“enforcement training center in a county that has a population of”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

One exemption from the lot-size limits is written for the area around a law enforcement training center in a county of 2.6 million or more, which describes a very narrow set of places.

[x] THE HOLEanalysis confidence 35%

THE TEXT

…“subchapter does not prohibit a municipality from imposing”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The savings clause lets a city impose restrictions that apply to all similarly situated lots or subdivisions. That language could be read to let broad rules back in against the small-lot protections.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 30, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Co-author authorized
  4. Read first time
  5. Referred to Local Government
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken in committee
  9. Left pending in committee
  10. Considered in public hearing
  11. Vote taken in committee
  12. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Co-author authorized
  17. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  18. Record vote
  19. Read 2nd time
  20. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Parker
  21. Amended
  22. Vote recorded in Journal
  23. Amendment(s) offered FA2 Menéndez
  24. Amended
  25. Vote recorded in Journal
  26. Passed to engrossment as amended
  27. Record vote
  28. Three day rule suspended
  29. Record vote
  30. Read 3rd time
  31. Passed
  32. Record vote
  33. Reported engrossed
  34. Received from the Senate
  35. Read first time
  36. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  37. Considered in public hearing
  38. Committee substitute considered in committee
  39. Reported favorably as substituted
  40. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  41. Committee report distributed
  42. Committee report sent to Calendars
  43. Considered in Calendars
  44. Placed on General State Calendar
  45. Read 2nd time
  46. Postponed 5/24/25 9:30 PM
  47. Laid out as postponed business
  48. Point of order sustained Rule 8, Section 10(b)
  49. Returned to committee
  50. Considered in formal meeting
  51. Committee substitute considered in committee
  52. Reported favorably as substituted
  53. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  54. Committee report distributed
  55. Committee report sent to Calendars
  56. Considered in Calendars
  57. Placed on Major State Calendar
  58. Read 2nd time
  59. Amendment(s) offered 1-Gates
  60. Point of order overruled Rule 6, Section 7(a)(2)
  61. Amended 1-Gates
  62. Record vote RV#3689
  63. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  64. Amended 2-Romero
  65. Record vote RV#3690
  66. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  67. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  68. Record vote RV#3691
  69. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  70. Read 3rd time
  71. Passed
  72. Record vote RV#3837
  73. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  74. House passage as amended reported
  75. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  76. Read
  77. Senate refuses to concur
  78. Senate requests conference committee
  79. Senate appoints conferees
  80. Senate refuses to concur-reported
  81. Senate requests conference committee-reported
  82. Senate appoints conferees-reported
  83. House grants request for conference committee
  84. House appoints conferees
  85. House grants request for conf comm-reported
  86. House appoints conferees-reported
  87. Conference committee report filed
  88. Conf. Comm. Report distributed
  89. Co-author authorized
  90. Rules suspended
  91. Record vote
  92. Senate adopts conference committee report
  93. Record vote
  94. Senate adopts conf. comm. report-reported
  95. House adopts conference committee report
  96. Record vote RV#4137
  97. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  98. House adopts conf. comm. report-reported
  99. Reported enrolled
  100. Signed in the Senate
  101. Signed in the House
  102. Sent to the Governor
  103. Signed by the Governor
  104. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“housing organization may bring an action against the municipality”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill lets builder trade groups and housing advocacy nonprofits sue cities without showing their own injury, and a winning claimant gets mandatory attorney's fees.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 86 yea · 43 nay

Senate · 29 yea · 2 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 28, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Mar 19, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes10

House Jun 1, 2025

Yea
78
Nay
57
Present, not voting
1
Absent
9
Excused
5
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 4137

Representative Gates moved to adopt the conference committee report on SB 15. The motion to adopt the conference committee report on SB 15 prevailed by (Record 4137): 78 Yeas, 57 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 78 (published)
  • Nay: 57 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 9 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 5 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 31, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

On motion of Senator Bettencourt, the Conference Committee Report was adopted by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 28, 2025

Yea
86
Nay
43
Present, not voting
2
Absent
13
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3837

SB 15 was passed by (Record 3837): 86 Yeas, 43 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 86 (published)
  • Nay: 43 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 13 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
87
Nay
48
Present, not voting
2
Absent
10
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3691

CSSB 15, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3691): 87 Yeas, 48 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 87 (published)
  • Nay: 48 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 10 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
78
Nay
47
Present, not voting
2
Absent
20
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3690

Amendment No. 2 was adopted by (Record 3690): 78 Yeas, 47 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 78 (published)
  • Nay: 47 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 20 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
97
Nay
26
Present, not voting
2
Absent
22
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3689

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 3689): 97 Yeas, 26 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 97 (published)
  • Nay: 26 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 22 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 19, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 19, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 15 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 19, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

SB 15 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 19, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 15 at this time on its second reading: SB 15, Relating to size and density requirements for residential lots in certain municipalities; authorizing a fee. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses66
For
43
Against
21
On
2
Names

For

  • Allen Boone Humphries Robinson LLP1 registration
  • Amazon1 registration
  • Americans for Prosperity1 registration
  • AURA1 registration
  • Baptist General Convention of Texas Christian Life Commission1 registration
  • Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Ecclesia Church1 registration
  • Goldwater Institute1 registration
  • Lumbermen's Association of Texas1 registration
  • Real Estate Council of Austin1 registration
  • Schwartz, Page & Harding LLP1 registration
  • Self4 registrations
  • Self; Americans for prosperity1 registration
  • Self; AURA1 registration
  • Self; Brundtland Development Group1 registration
  • Self; Cooper and Company1 registration
  • Self; Dallas Housing Coalition1 registration
  • Self; Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Self; Houston Habitat for Humanity1 registration
  • Self; Institute for Justice1 registration
  • Self; Texans for Reasonable Solutions1 registration
  • Self; Texas A&M Student Government Association1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association of Builders1 registration
  • Texans For Housing1 registration
  • Texans for Housing1 registration
  • Texans For Reasonable Solutions1 registration
  • Texas 20361 registration
  • Texas A&M Student Government1 registration
  • Texas Affiliation of Affordable Housing Providers (TAAHP)1 registration
  • Texas Apartment Association1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders1 registration
  • Texas Association of Business1 registration
  • Texas Conservative Coalition Research Institute1 registration
  • Texas Farm Bureau1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation1 registration
  • Texas REALTORS1 registration
  • Texas Realtors1 registration
  • Texas Society of Architects1 registration
  • The Real Estate Council, Dallas1 registration
  • The Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops1 registration

Against

  • City of Austin1 registration
  • City of Dallas1 registration
  • City of Denton1 registration
  • City of Garland1 registration
  • City of Irving1 registration
  • City of Lewisville Texas1 registration
  • City of McAllen1 registration
  • City of McKinney1 registration
  • Self4 registrations
  • Self; City of Georgetown1 registration
  • Self; Texas Eagle Forum1 registration
  • Self; Texas neighborhood association1 registration
  • Self; Texas Neighborhood Coalition2 registrations
  • Self; The Town of Flower Mound1 registration
  • Self; Town of Flower Mound2 registrations
  • Self; True texas project1 registration

On

  • City of Corpus Christi1 registration
  • Texas Appleseed1 registration
Sources

66 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 30, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 4, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 6:27 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 6 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 3919 by Gates (identical)

Subjects

Charitable & Nonprofit Organizations

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Housing--General

Property Interests--General

Property Interests--Property Owners Association

COURT OF APPEALS, TEXAS (VJ85R)

Text

The text as introduced · 949 words

2025S0153-1 02/28/25

By: Bettencourt, et al.
S.B. No. 15

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to size and density requirements for residential lots in

certain municipalities; authorizing a fee.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 211, Local Government Code, is amended

by adding Subchapter D to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER D. RESIDENTIAL ZONING LIMITATIONS IN CERTAIN

MUNICIPALITIES

Sec. 211.051. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:

(1) "Housing organization" means a:

(A) trade or industry group organized under the

laws of this state consisting of local members primarily engaged in

the construction or management of housing units;

(B) nonprofit organization organized under the

laws of this state that:

(i) provides or advocates for increased

access or reduced barriers to housing; and

(ii) has filed written or oral comments

with the legislature; or

(C) nonprofit organization organized under the

laws of this state that is engaged in public policy research,

education, and outreach that includes housing policy-related

issues and advocacy.

(2) "Small lot" means a residential lot that is 4,000

square feet or less.

Sec. 211.052. APPLICABILITY. (a) This subchapter applies

only to a municipality that:

(1) has a population of more than 90,000; and

(2) is wholly or partly located in a county with a

population of more than 300,000.

(b) This subchapter does not apply to a one-mile radius from

the perimeter of a campus that includes a law enforcement training

center in a county that has a population of 2,600,000 or more but

less than 2,700,000.

Sec. 211.053. CONSTRUCTION OF SUBCHAPTER. This subchapter

may not be construed to affect requirements directly related to:

(1) the use and occupancy of residential units leased

for a term of less than 30 days; or

(2) flooding, sewer facilities, or well water located

on an individual residential lot and serving only that lot.

Sec. 211.054. CERTAIN DWELLING UNIT LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS

PROHIBITED. (a) This section applies only to a tract of land that:

(1) will be platted and located in an area zoned for

single-family homes;

(2) is five acres or more; and

(3) has no recorded map or plat.

(b) A municipality may not adopt or enforce an ordinance,

rule, or other measure that requires:

(1) a residential lot to be:

(A) larger than 1,400 square feet;

(B) wider than 20 feet; or

(C) deeper than 60 feet; or

(2) if regulating the density of dwelling units on a

residential lot, a ratio of dwelling units per acre that results in

fewer than 31.1 units per acre.

Sec. 211.055. SMALL LOTS. (a) A municipality may not adopt

or enforce an ordinance, rule, or other measure that requires a

small lot to have:

(1) a building, waterway, plane, or other setback

greater than:

(A) five feet from the front or back of the

property; or

(B) five feet from the side of the property;

(2) covered parking;

(3) more than one parking space per unit;

(4) off-site parking;

(5) more than 30 percent open space or permeable

surface;

(6) fewer than three full stories not exceeding 10

feet in height measured from the interior floor to ceiling;

(7) a maximum building bulk;

(8) a wall articulation requirement; or

(9) any other zoning restriction that imposes

restrictions inconsistent with this subsection, including

restrictions through contiguous zoning districts or uses or from

the creation of an overlapping zoning district.

(b) A municipality may require with respect to a small lot:

(1) the sharing of a driveway with another lot; or

(2) permitting fees equivalent to the permitting fees

charged for the development of a lot the use of which is restricted

to a single-family residence.

Sec. 211.056. NO EFFECT ON OTHER ZONING AUTHORITY. This

subchapter does not prohibit a municipality from imposing

restrictions that are applicable to all similarly situated lots or

subdivisions, including requiring all subdivisions or all small

lots to fully mitigate stormwater runoff.

Sec. 211.057. NO EFFECT ON HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATIONS AND

OTHER PRIVATE AGREEMENTS. This subchapter does not prohibit

property owners from enforcing rules or deed restrictions imposed

by a homeowners' association or by other private agreement.

Sec. 211.058. ACTION. (a) A person adversely affected or

aggrieved by a municipality's violation of this subchapter or a

housing organization may bring an action against the municipality

or an officer or employee of the municipality in the officer's or

employee's official capacity for relief described by Subsection

(c).

(b) A claimant must bring an action under this section in a

county in which the real property that is the subject of the action

is wholly or partly located.

(c) In an action brought under this section, a court may:

(1) enter a declaratory judgment under Chapter 37,

Civil Practice and Remedies Code;

(2) issue a writ of mandamus compelling a defendant

officer or employee to comply with this subchapter;

(3) issue an injunction preventing the defendant from

violating this subchapter; and

(4) award damages to the claimant for economic losses

caused by the defendant's violation of this subchapter if the

claimant is a person affected or aggrieved by the violation that is

the basis for the action.

(d) A court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and court

costs incurred in bringing an action under this section to a

prevailing claimant.

(e) Governmental immunity of a municipality to suit and from

liability is waived to the extent of liability created by this

section. Official immunity of a municipal officer or employee is

waived to the extent of liability created by this section.

(f) The Fifteenth Court of Appeals has exclusive

intermediate appellate jurisdiction over an appeal or original

proceeding arising from an action brought under this section.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.